How an Ibadan Presenter Lost Her Job After Requesting Time Off for Antenatal Care

A freelance radio presenter at Soul FM 95.7, Ibadan, Waliyah Abdullateef Aduke, has been relieved of her dutiesfollowing her formal request to be excused from work every Thursday for medical treatment and antenatal check-ups.

According to a termination letter dated July 4, 2025, obtained by Primus Media, the station’s management cited her health-related requests as the reason for her dismissal.

“The Management has decided to relieve you of your duties going forward with this organization, effective from today, 4th of July, 2025. We don’t want the job to stop you from attending to antenatal and every other medical appointment. You can come back and reapply for the job later, when you are medically fit,” the letter read in part.

Mrs. Aduke had previously submitted two formal letters to the management—one requesting to be excused every Thursday afternoon for antenatal care, and another proposing a change in her work schedule to accommodate her hospital obligations. However, the station declined both requests and proceeded with the termination, citing operational limitations and contractual expectations.

Speaking to Primus Media, the station’s Chairman provided further context, recalling a previous incident when Aduke tendered her resignation, claiming she was being discriminated against due to a speech impediment. At that time, he publicly rejected her resignation and warned against any form of victimization within the station.

He further explained that after that episode, Aduke went missing from work for a full week without prior notice. She reportedly cited missing belongings, later followed by revelations of health issues and pregnancy. The Chairman expressed concern over the inconsistencies in her explanations and clarified that the station was not officially informed about her pregnancy before the absences began.

Despite the complications, he noted that her full salary for the month of June had been paid. He also emphasized that the station’s decision is not permanent, stating:

“The door is not closed. She may reapply once she is medically fit and ready to resume regular duties.”

The case has sparked conversations online around workplace policies, employee welfare, and the treatment of women undergoing antenatal care, particularly in media organizations.